In contrast to the status quo, some advocates of educational reform have suggested a more competitive market and less bureaucratic structure. Such a model would favor nonbureaucratic competition and accountability measures similar to those in the business world. While such ideas are not immediately attractive, they do have certain advantages. Listed below are some of them. While there is no one solution to all of our educational challenges, they are a starting point for reform.
First, parents would have the freedom to choose a school for their child. As parents, we have legitimate expectations for the education of our children. The current educational system is based on a zero-sum political system, which creates winners and losers. A free market would allow parents to choose a school they feel best suits their child’s needs and interests. Second, education providers would be motivated to respond to the demands of parents. Thus, a successful school would expand operations and inspire imitation. Meanwhile, a failing school would lose patronage and go out of business.
Read more about: magazinehub.net
Third, states would equalize their education spending and enforce higher teaching standards. Lastly, school districts could reallocate resources to hire better-educated teachers. Such a model would increase the level of achievement for students of color. The restructured schools would send at least 90 percent of their students to college. Further, restructured schools would foster more collaboration between students and teachers. For example, parents would share a teacher’s workload, allowing children to have an opportunity to ask questions.
Globepredict.com is one of the best website where you find out latest news also click here infolism.com for more information. You can visit here time2business.net to know more and if you want to get various types of news then check out this site acodyssey.com